Re: LocalTalk support?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2001-05-08 9:15, Michael Schmitz at
>> i think the `nobody has bothered' is probably the explanation.
> Nope, it's actuakky pretty difficult to implement and probably
> not worth the hassle (at least not for anyone who'll never use
> that feature, sorry this is how free software works).
No, I know. I'm half inclined to tackle this myself, but I'm
currently too interested in spending time at my day job and with my
> Localtalk over
> serial requires synchronous mode operation of the SCC and the
> protocol timing constraints are pretty tight. You don't want to do
> that sort of stuff in non-realtime context. In a multitasking OS
> you don't want to do it busy-waiting in the interrupt handler
> either. But you may see things different, please go ahead and prove
> me wrong.
I used to write device drivers for DOS and Windows (years ago!), so I
understand what you're saying. Ugh.
> PC localtalk cards have a coprocessor to offload the protocol
> handling to IIRC.
Ah. I had an inkling this might be the case.
More and more, I'm thinking I just need to go ahead and buy that
Postscript-capable laser printer I've had my eye on....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Craig S. Cottingham
PGP key available from:
ID=0xA2FFBE41, fingerprint=6AA8 2E28 2404 8A95 B8FC 7EFC 136F 0CEF A2FF BE41