Re: Bug#83434: "apt-get install gnome-panel" complains about broken packages
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I think this is just because gnome-core and gnome-applets haven't been built and
> uploaded for PPC in a *very* long time. Building those two packages (and their
> Build-Depends before them) should fix this. If this user has the guts to use
> unstable, he/she should be able to recognize such a missing dependency for what it
> is. :-)
>
> If I get some time this weekend I'll bulid the latest everything (through nautilus
> and gnumeric) and upload myself.
Here's something I should really have announced on this list:
Build logs are now available! Look at:
<http://voltaire.debian.org/buildd/buildlogs/<sourcepackage>/latest>
Gnome-core, it tells me, is waiting on "libgtkhtml-dev". That comes
from gtkhtml, which waits on libcapplet-dev, from control-center. That
is in turn waiting on libglade-gnome0-dev (>= 0.13-2), from libglade.
At last attempt (a while ago), libglade utterly failed to build.
Currently, it doesn't build because libbonobo-dev is not installable.
libbonobo-dev is not installable because bonobo is out of date, I
think, and possibly because gnome-print is out of date. In turn,
bonobo is not built because it has an unsatisfiable build dep on
gnome-print, because gnome-print is out of date. It looks to me like
gnome-print didn't build because of a gdk-pixbuf dependency somewhere.
In fact, it all comes back to a missing build dependency in
gnome-print (libgdk-pixbuf-dev)! I -hate- doing this, but I'm going to
force the issue and build it myself.
Vincent, mind fixing this? Meanwhile, I've uploaded a new (binary)
gnome-print. It may take a few days to propogate the dependency chain,
but the rest of gnome should build now.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: