[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mozilla M13 Release Build Available



It still seems to wait forever at 
  	nNCL: registering deferred (0)

Maybe my machine is too slow (7200/90 with 16MB)???

- Ramprasad

Kevin: I tried your new libelfs too

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 phandel@cise.ufl.edu wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 ramp@oddjob.uchicago.edu wrote:
> 
> > To get the required libelf.so.0 do the following
> > 
> > # cd /usr/lib ; ls -l libelf.*
> >     This should show libelf.a
> > 
> > # ld -shared -o libelf.so.0 --whole-archive libelf.a
> >     will create the dynamic library needed.
> > 
> > I went beyond this and stuff started happening but seemed to hang.
> > Maybe it was doing something?
> 
> I had to also do this:
> 
> (5) adsl 4:15pm /usr/lib> ln -s libstdc++-libc6.1-1.1.so.2 libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3
> 
> ...and now it works perfectly, although I am seeing a lot of this error:
> 
> nsLayoutHistoryState::GetState, ERROR getting History state for the key
> 
> I tried compiling it myself from the source, using:
> 
> ./configure --disable-mailnews --disable-tests --enable-x11-shm 
> --enable-optimize --disable-debug --enable-stript-libs --disable-double-buffer
> 
> ...and replacing -g -O2 with -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer, and it compiled
> fine and ran very quickly, although the version number keeps saying
> "1999122808" from
> dist/bin/chrome/navigator/locale/en-US/navigator.dtd:<!ENTITY
> buildId.label "Build ID: 1999122808">
> and
> xpfe/browser/resources/locale/en-US/navigator.dtd:<!ENTITY  buildId.label
> "Build ID: 1999122808">
> although I was careful to grab the latest nightly source tarball and then
> later the official M13 source tarball ... any ideas?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter 
> 
> -- 
> Peter F. Handel          "[The anti-Christ] also forced everyone, small and
> phandel@cise.ufl.edu      great ... to receive a mark [smart card?] on his
> www.cise.ufl.edu/~phandel right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could
> FAX: (561) 619-8051       buy or sell unless he had the mark"-Revelation13:16
> 
> 


Reply to: