Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sergio Brandano wrote:
>
> I am now on an Intel platform, and my dpkg says:
>
> >Package: netbase
> >Priority: standard
> >Section: base
> >Installed-Size: 1069
> >Maintainer: Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
> >Architecture: i386
> >Version: 3.16-7
> >Replaces: netstd (<< 3.00)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Depends: tcpd, libc6 (>= 2.1)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Suggests: cpp, debconf
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Conflicts: xinetd (<= 2.2.1-8), debconf (<< 0.2.34)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >Filename: dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/base/netbase_3.16-7.deb
> >Size: 503568
> >MD5sum: 4f694d71f17a771d106d751caf37078c
> >Description: Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
> > In order to make use of the network you need a few tools to
> > configure it. This package contains all the necessary tools
> > to configure the networking interfaces, to setup the routing
> > tables and to start other services using the inetd server.
>
> Why is that, generally speaking, powerpc and intel packages have
> different dependencies?
>
I would say that this is version skid then, Intel had the dependency
problem for a couple of weeks.
Obviously PPC netbase is older than PPC netstd (and Intel netbase).
Once the version skid resolves the problem should therefore clear up.
--
Daniel Taylor Senior Test Engineer Digi International
danielt@digi.com Open systems win.
Reply to: