Re: gcc 2.95.2 vs 2.91
> *sigh* this isn't just powerpc. this is x86 too. I can't get ANY kernels
> to compile with gcc 2.95 or 2.91. Folks, I think at this point it's
> SERIOUSLY advisable to just abandon gcc 2.9x as primary and change it to
> optional. There's just too much stuff that will NOT compile with it. I
> mean, hell, the damn thing is spitting out asm errors for 'mov' on x86!
> I've had NO problems with 126.96.36.199 or 2.8.x to date.
_any_ kernels? i just compiled 2.2.13 on gccf 2.95.1 and 2.95.2.