Re: X patches
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 09:22:48AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 10:23:10AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> > > > Notice this are all debian patches, not only the one for powerpc. They are cut
> > > > in a lot of small patches.
> > >
> > > Right, but the PPC patches are in there someplace then? Right now my
> > > 3.3.5's have an accel glitch on ATI (i'm wondering if my patch around the
> > > regb/etc stuff was wrong) which the debian FBDev doesn't show. Reminds
> > > me, which compiler was used on those rpms? 2.95.x ? (I see 2.95.2-0pre3 or
> > > 4 is out pkg wise..)
> >
> > huh, yes i think, perhaps the version before that. Does the X server not say
> > things about that when you ask him ? I compiled it some weeks ago. I used the
> > new glibc also.
>
> Hmm. Can you double check this? I'm using glibc 2.1.3 snapshot & 2.95.2
> pre-release. Right now we've got the same patches that affect "fbdev"
> (grep -l fbdev *) but the current debian X server doesn't have this minor
> glitch (rage pro & blackbox i think).
Current stuff is :
glibc 2.1.2 and gcc 2.95.1.
But i am not sure that that was used when i compiled it.
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
Reply to: