Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy
- To: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Cc: Debian Sparc Team <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy
- From: Juan Cespedes <cespedes@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:50:54 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980121005054.60714@gizmo>
- In-reply-to: <v04003a09b0e596154118@[192.168.42.2]>; from Joel Klecker on Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 03:46:11PM -0800
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980106110747.10693A-100000@dwarf.polaris.net> <87d8hsnqwx.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <dmmen28i23t.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk> <874t34nj4v.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <v04003a09b0e596154118@[192.168.42.2]>
On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 03:46:11PM -0800, Joel Klecker wrote:
>
> powerpc, and sparc both use glibc 2.1, but I expect that the others will
> move in that direction eventually, once glibc 2.1 goes final.
I didn't know that powerpc was already using glibc-2.1. Is
this the case? If so, we might work together and have the same
source tree.
The source package we use with sparc is called `glibc-sparc',
but if powerpc also uses pre2.1, I might rename it to `glibc-pre2.1'.
All the binary packages have the same name they have in other
architectures (libc6, libc6-dev, etc).
--
Juan Cespedes
Reply to: