Re: support for XB-Popcon-Reports: no
On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 06:32:52AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 23:26 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Could you explain why ?
>
> So that people using packages that they didn't create and that don't
> have the special header can choose which packages are private.
But in that case, the package name has likely leaked already.
What else do you want to protect ? Are the current safeguard
insufficient ?
We should not encourage users to distort popcon statistic with partial
reports.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: