Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2025 12:52:48 +0000 with message-id <87tsxkdmjj.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1123657: debian-policy: Virtual package name list not updated has caused the Debian Bug report #1123657, regarding debian-policy: Virtual package name list not updated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1123657: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1123657 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debian-policy: Virtual package name list not updated
- From: Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:46:12 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 878qeyh6mj.fsf@giraffe.home.nonempty.org>
Package: debian-policy X-Debbugs-Cc: gspr@nonempty.org Version: 4.7.2.0 Severity: minor Hello, Policy currently refers to an authoritative list of virtual package names at [1]. However, that list does not seem to have been updated since 2022. I can find at least one virtual package (vulkan-icd) that is not on the list. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.yaml Best, GardAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org>
- Cc: 1123657-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1123657: debian-policy: Virtual package name list not updated
- From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 12:52:48 +0000
- Message-id: <87tsxkdmjj.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87jyyghw8t.fsf@giraffe.home.nonempty.org>
- References: <[🔎] 878qeyh6mj.fsf@giraffe.home.nonempty.org> <[🔎] 87ike2jsjy.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 878qeyh6mj.fsf@giraffe.home.nonempty.org> <[🔎] 87jyyghw8t.fsf@giraffe.home.nonempty.org>
Hello, On Sun 21 Dec 2025 at 01:09pm +01, Gard Spreemann wrote: > Ah, that's probably it then. I'm not within the coordinating group, so > I'm not really sure what the status of vulkan-icd is. > > Thanks. Feel free to close the bug. Thanks, closing. -- Sean WhittonAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---