Bug#1107137: Distinguish "native source packsge" from "native version number"
- To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, 1107137@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1107137: Distinguish "native source packsge" from "native version number"
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:16:50 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 26726.47874.20168.838332@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Reply-to: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, 1107137@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <8734brjze4.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com>
- References: <aD0BjH4eEn6wRSWa@thunder.hadrons.org> <26687.33.748329.758629@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87r000ledh.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <26700.3084.24149.187694@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <26700.3224.441160.409167@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <684C1343.1020606@fastmail.fm> <26700.5781.641765.815401@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <26700.6039.27745.332102@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <87y0tjkavt.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <26712.16369.438100.479820@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <8734brjze4.fsf@zephyr.silentflame.com> <aD0BjH4eEn6wRSWa@thunder.hadrons.org>
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1107137: Distinguish "native source packsge" from "native version number""):
> [comments]
Well, I tried drafting a substantive reply to these comments but it
didn't seem to come out very usefully. The bottom line is that I
still prefer my wording.
Patches 1-4 have been seconded by Russ. I'm hoping patch 5 isn't
controversial. Could I have a second for the revised version of the
series?
That is,
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107137#112
patches 1-4
plus
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107137#137
patch 5
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: