Bug#1074014: Bug#1073608: Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
Helmut Grohne dixit:
>that the way people tend to use mksh is by adding a local diversion for
Unfortunately not.
The way we have to do it since squeeze, when dash unilaterally broke
cross-package coordination, is:
dpkg-reconfigure dash ⇒ remove its owning of /bin/sh
(so it reverts to bash)
ln -sf lksh /bin/sh
This cleanly persists across upgrades, bash was never problematic
wrt this.
>I don't think the CTTE has actually issued a ruling on DEP17 or
>/usr-move short of repealing the moratorium in order to enable moving
>forward.
That, and that UsrMove via symlinks /bin etc. is to be instated.
There is absolutely no reason to force files to move, given they
are now aliased already *anyway*.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yes, I hate users and I want them to suffer.
-- Marco d'Itri on gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Bug#1074014: Bug#1073622: Bug#1073608: mksh, pax: no move to /usr going to happen, because:
- From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>