Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology

To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: 1067079@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:38:15 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zfuv98xk.fsf@melete.silentflame.com>
Reply-to: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, 1067079@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Zfez4Cs43yxWelbd@localhost> (Josh Triplett's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:24:16 -0700")
References: <[🔎] Zfez4Cs43yxWelbd@localhost> <[🔎] Zfez4Cs43yxWelbd@localhost>

Hello Josh,

Was there some recent packaging situation that prompted you to think
about this?  I'm cautious about adding it in the absence of that.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

References:
- Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
  - From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
Next by Date: Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
Previous by thread: Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
Next by thread: Bug#1067079: Clarify that policy on a technology does not implicitly mandate that technology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread