On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 20:51:46 +0200 Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> wrote: > > Ok, how about: "the whole project, minus natureshadow@debian.org who > > appears to be unfamiliar with the concept of hyperboles, is moving > > toward git and Salsa". Better? > > No. > > Your "hyperbole" very much read as "Come on, minority who cares about > the mail workflow, you're weird anachronists, get onto the Salsa train already!" > > So that's what I am criticizing. Sure, and you just coincidentally happened to leave out the part that says the exact opposite: > Snarks aside, allowing merge requests to be open on Salsa in > _addition_ to attachments to the BTS, as the vast majority of other > packages already do, doesn't take away anything from you, but would > add quite a lot for the rest of us, who find ourselves very limited > and very much barrier-ized by clunky, old and painful email-based > processes. Which means you are actually doing what you accuse me of - you are not content with being able to keep using mail workflows for yourself, you want to actively stop everybody from being able to use Salsa too. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part