Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var
- To: 945269@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: rra@debian.org
- Subject: Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var
- From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:39:56 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 58cf3de7a866d50956446d0f4510c714169d2f31.camel@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, 945269@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <8bf97b7ef3f5f70cd7f05c1020a4b9d077148a7b.camel@debian.org>
- References: <87wn0jtrqw.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <CAMw=ZnRXpAtvLpPq5TqUKMXOP2GTSxJe9JUji1PSuKkhxQ42KA@mail.gmail.com> <ZHyYK1h51nFlLUfJ@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> <877csgho5c.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <ZH8RPwb73hAp/EuU@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk> <ZIhmSZcKzfAloKIu@hindley.org.uk> <87zg5372zw.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <ZIigPSqnY3AZJm2h@hindley.org.uk> <87ilbn3fca.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org> <a99992f40cbcbe8a50a0e4e4586fdbe6c2f25472.camel@debian.org> <87ilblyo3b.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <CAMw=ZnRHPM3sq9QHvqoz93CGwM3VODw9QGDBHP8UoiThWLx62A@mail.gmail.com> <ece762fac202337afd688cc838e65b713d379a68.camel@debian.org> <8bf97b7ef3f5f70cd7f05c1020a4b9d077148a7b.camel@debian.org> <8736egibhq.fsf@43-1.org>
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 12:17:05 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:53:24 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 13:38:12 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 13:03, Sean Whitton
> <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri 16 Jun 2023 at 05:57PM +01, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is there anything needed from me to make progress on this?
Any
> > changes
> > > > > required to the last revision posted?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, Russ posted some comments on your most recent revision, I
> > believe.
> > >
> > > Last one I can find with specifics is:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945269#140
> > >
> > > Which I think I have addressed in a follow-up. Did I miss
> something?
> >
> > Russ, anything I've missed that you want me to change from the most
> > recent revision at
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945269#160 ;?
>
> Monthly ping. Anything I can do to unblock this?
Another monthly ping. Would be great to be able to make progress on
this.
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to: