[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 6.1.3. Multiple binary packages question



On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 11:19:06PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 09:21:00PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 09:29:04AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > >>>>> "Kristian" == Kristian Penno <kristian.penno@ceos.com.au> writes:
> > >     Kristian> source package is referenced.  The lyx source package uses
> > >     Kristian> some shell commands to move files around in the rules
> > >     Kristian> file.  Is this preferred to using debhelper
> > >     Kristian> <package>.install files?
> > > No.
> > > If .install files work for you, that's better.
> The drawback of dh_install is that it requires more diskspace to build than
> dh_movefiles but is less error prone.
> So unless your package is very large, it is safer to use dh_install.

interesting, I've never heard of dh_movefiles before.

what does "more diskspace" mean, however? kilobytes? terabytes? 100% of
the diskspace used by the files installed? 200%?

"my" largest package was less than 100mb in size, which can be a bit annoying for
uploads, but for diskspace during build, several gigabytes (or more) are
not uncommon, so I'm having a somewhat hard time imaginening that the
above is a relavant argument in most situations.

But I might be wrong. :)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Homophobia is a sin against god.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: