Hello, On Wed 26 Apr 2023 at 04:48PM -06, Sam Hartman wrote: > I guess that's consistent with RFC 2119. > And RFC 2119 SHOULD means that the requirement is RECOMMENDED, and an > implementation that does not follow the SHOULD needs to have a reason > for not following the recommendation. Just to note that Debian Policy's definition of these terms is not quite the same as the RFC process definitions (I know you know this -- just wanted to note that they're not the most relevant definitions). -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature