El 4/1/23 a las 17:45, Julien Cristau escribió:
Like I said in the debootstrap bug, I believe we should treat a case where a package is Priority: required but not actually required by the Essential set as a bug in package priorities, and neither debootstrap nor policy need to change.
I take your word that policy does not need to change and I've just closed this report, as there is clearly not a consensus that policy needs a clarification. I see that you have just downgraded the debootstrap bug to wishlist. Have you actually asked ftpmasters to downgrade the priorities that would have to be downgraded so that debootstrap does not install packages that are not build-essential when using the buildd profile? Thanks.