[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#944920: Revise terminology used to specify requirements



>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:

    Russ> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
    >> In attempting to revise recent GRs to use the same terminology as
    >> Policy, I got frustrated again by the lack of precision of our
    >> current language.  This is an attempt to make a minor
    >> improvement.  It doesn't go all the way to using all-caps terms
    >> the way that RFC 2119 does; I think that might be an improvement,
    >> but it was a larger change than I wanted to tackle.

    Russ> It's been over a year since the last activity on this bug so
    Russ> although there were enough seconds for a revised form of this
    Russ> patch, I'm reposting it to remind people where the discussion
    Russ> was and as a quick double-check that I didn't mess up the
    Russ> rebase.

Hi.
I reconfirm my second after reviewing the patch.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: