On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 11:18:35AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> If I get no pushbacks I'll also propose some text later on when I'm
> freer (unless somebody beats me to it!).
I'm hereby seeking seconds (or, well, suggestions for improvements) for
the following diff, which is based on
daa7d69fbffc1c438002993860f0df407e4aaeb1 (4.6.0.1):
|--- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
|+++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
|@@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ package) are:
|
| - :ref:`Rules-Requires-Root <s-f-Rules-Requires-Root>`
|
|+- :ref:`Description <s-f-Description>`
|+
| The fields in the binary package paragraphs are:
|
| - :ref:`Package <s-f-Package>` (mandatory)
|@@ -652,9 +654,14 @@ orderings. [#]_
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
| In a source or binary control file, the ``Description`` field contains a
|-description of the binary package, consisting of two parts, the synopsis
|-or the short description, and the long description. It is a multiline
|-field with the following format:
|+description of the package, consisting of two parts, the synopsis or the short
|+description, and the long description.
|+
|+When used in a source control file in the general paragraph (i.e., the first
|+one, for the source package), the text in this field is relevant for all binary
|+packages built by the given source package.
|+
|+It is a multiline field with the following format:
|
| ::
|
I also pushed my change here:
https://salsa.debian.org/mattia/policy/-/commit/807bd3ea551087df33c54c270e7f11151c8b0ae2
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature