Bug#968664: marked as done (debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, again and again)
Your message dated Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:48:38 +0000
with message-id <E1k8T8Y-000E4r-Oq@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#968664: fixed in debian-policy 4.5.0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #968664,
regarding debian-policy: recommends an old version of libjs-sphinxdoc, again and again
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
968664: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.0.2
Hi,
as already happened, (#910561, #921889, #932359, #959005), the latest
libjs-sphinxdoc (3.2.1-1) breaks d-p's Recommends.
As a sidenote, I see bug #658238, from which this problem descends, has
been closed in sphinx version 1.8.1-1.
Thank you, once more!
Regards,
Gabriele Stilli
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: debian-policy
Source-Version: 4.5.0.3
Done: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 968664@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> (supplier of updated debian-policy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:24:51 -0700
Source: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.5.0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 953629 968664
Changes:
debian-policy (4.5.0.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add a sample grep command for finding copyright notices in upstream
source code to an existing footnote in section 2.3.
* 3.2.1: tweak wording to avoid suggesting that Policy forbids using
Debian revisions for packages using a native source package format
(Closes: #953629).
Thank you to Ian Jackson for the suggestion.
* Switch back dh_linktree -> dh_sphinxdoc now that #658238 has been
resolved (Closes: #968664)
- Update substvars usage
- Drop linktree config
- Drop ${misc:Depends} -> ${linktree:Recommends} hack from d/rules.
We now just have ${sphinxdoc:Depends} in the Recommends: field.
Checksums-Sha1:
b9d30582d24660a471de60668fea886905e44a63 2052 debian-policy_4.5.0.3.dsc
3425eba2f3cebe564fad8c21ae6b1fe6691ab35c 541072 debian-policy_4.5.0.3.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
e34e736db06fe3fe8ffc9d4541f1a180b3304d4c8b7ea1b58c548692d1bb3a05 2052 debian-policy_4.5.0.3.dsc
e8b8aab321ad1ce915ae6b3b133c4d69d69a2086967c11b626cf825dcfc39549 541072 debian-policy_4.5.0.3.tar.xz
Files:
5945fb266e359a4f0e01249708a0969e 2052 doc optional debian-policy_4.5.0.3.dsc
2e2ea2bfaef0eb413f3816df62c20782 541072 doc optional debian-policy_4.5.0.3.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=d7M7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: