[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy



Hello,

On Sun 29 Dec 2019 at 04:36pm -08, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Right, what I think is in scope for Policy is advising packagers on which
> readiness signaling mechanism to use if upstream supports several.  If one
> is relatively new to packaging daemons, this may not be something on one's
> radar to look at, but there are substantial, if subtle, advantages to
> using Type=notify if upstream already supports it.  (Type=dbus is fine, of
> course, and we probably shouldn't doument that as well, although my guess
> is that things that register with D-Bus are more likely to already know
> about these subtleties.)

Yes, let's be sure to get this in.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: