Re: Proposal for next steps for systemd-related policy
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Right, what I think is in scope for Policy is advising packagers on
> which readiness signaling mechanism to use if upstream supports several.
> If one is relatively new to packaging daemons, this may not be something
> on one's radar to look at, but there are substantial, if subtle,
> advantages to using Type=notify if upstream already supports it.
> (Type=dbus is fine, of course, and we probably shouldn't doument that as
> well, although my guess is that things that register with D-Bus are more
> likely to already know about these subtleties.)
That was supposed to be "we probably should document that as well." I
think I edited that sentence too much. Sorry about the confusion.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: