Hello Adam, On Sun 01 Dec 2019 at 06:07PM +01, Adam Borowski wrote: > This idea being discussed hasn't been announced anywhere. And, it's > extremely harmful to the support of anything non-systemd, while providing > very little if any benefit to systemd users as well. It also would cause > doubling of maintainer effort. > > But, in the light of the ongoing GR, arguing would be a waste of time at > this moment. Thus, could you please put this change into abeyance, and > once the GR is finished, we'll discuss whether to withdraw (or even reverse, > it should be "should not"!), according to the GR's result. I'm afraid I fail to see how this bug interacts with the current GR at all. It seems to me that it could interact with the current GR only if the current GR was about changing the default init system, but no-one is proposing anything like that. How do you think this bug is prejudicial to advocates of alternative init systems? At any rate, we're unlikely to do a normative Policy release before voting is done because we usually wait until we have more than two normative changes waiting on our 'next' branch before doing that. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature