[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#944325: please fix this unclear and obtuse phrasing in §7.8 (suggestion provided)



On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 10:53:31AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 07 Nov 2019 at 04:51PM -05, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> 
> > I suggest replacing the whole sentence with "The purpose of this field
> > is exclusively for cases where a package's license, or when DFSG
> > requirements, necessitate its presence; Built-Using should not be used
> > for any other purpose".  This is much more clear and it flows
> > nicely into the next sentence "In particular, it should not be added
> > solely to enable finding packages that should be rebuilt against newer
> > versions of their build dependencies."
> 
> Thank you for this.  I agree that the sentence is unnecessarily hard to
> read.  Perhaps you could propose a patch against policy.git.

You're welcome :-)  Done!
  https://salsa.debian.org/sten-guest/policy/merge_requests/2


Cheers,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: