On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:03:15AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Like you document in the checklist addition to the virtual packages:
> > also those don't require any change to existing packages, it's just
> > there for everybody to know that starting from that version they can
> > make use of that new thing.
>
> From your point of view, if we started to add a summary of d/changelog
> entries which are /not/ accounted for by the upgrading checklist to the
> d-d-a e-mail, would that be sufficient? Or do you think this stuff has
> to be in the upgrading checklist?
I only read the title of the d-d-a mail, but I read the upgrade
checklist many times over the course of the years. Hope that answers
your question :)
I think this would be the case where a 3rd party thought would be
welcome :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature