[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#930666: Please document consensus on use of dh sequencer



On Vi, 21 iun 19, 13:09:29, Sean Whitton wrote:
> 
>     There are sometimes good reasons to use a different approach.  For
>     example, the standard tools for packaging software written in some
>     languages may use another tool; some rarer packaging patterns, such
>     as multiple builds of the same software with different options, are
>     easier to express with other tools; and a packager working on a new
                                                                     ^^^^^
>     packaging helper might want to use their new tool.  
                                              ^^^^^

Dropping "new" would cover both the case of existing (Jonas and cdbs) 
and new packaging helpers ;)

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: