Bug#930553: how about encoding ???
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 03:53:07PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 09:04:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > While doing sphinx conversion, I realized that it may be better to
> > update as follows:
...
If you see my initial diff on the first line of common.ent
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
Although for ASCII code range (7-bits), iso-8859-1, utf-8, ascii are the
same, shouldn't we use UTF-8 in line with XML code? Was there any
specific issues to do this?
THis is no rush but I think this is the right way.... (Am I wrong?)
Regards,
Osamu
Reply to: