Hello Adam, On Sun 30 Dec 2018 at 03:39pm +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 02:07:25PM +0000, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Ideally, this would be reviewed and seconded by people working on init >> stuff, so I'm not going to second it myself unless we don't get interest. > > I asked around, and got the following remark: > > Mark Hindley: > } Could you just replace "providing logind API (over D-Bus and /run/)" > } with something like "providing logind APIs (D-Bus and sd-login)" in the > } upgrading checklist? > } > } /run/ is really not part of the API and nobody should be using it directly. > > Which makes sense -- directing people to wrappers and libraries instead of > the files would be preferred. The less ad-hoc undocumented APIs are there, > the better. > > But, this is a change to the upgrading checklist rather than the main part > of the Policy -- not sure if you want seconds for that. No, the upgrading checklist is at the Policy Editor's discretion. No need for seconding. > The upgrading-checklist part would then be: > > +virtual > + New ``logind`` and ``default-logind`` virtual packages for a package > + providing logind API (over D-Bus and sd-login), and for Debian's > + preferred implementation, respectively. > > (one word difference). I'll happily use this instead. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature