Hello, On Mon, Feb 26 2018, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > This needs to be reworded. "the +really convention" is probably not > really policy material (feels more like devref's) and therfore probably > not mentioned here. I disagree. Policy often describes conventions; in particular, conventions that exist in response to things that are forbidden or required by Policy. Moreover, we want someone reading about epochs to be hinted towards the +really convention, without hoping that they just happen to head over to devref right after. > And with this the mention of d-devel happened twice in your patch. This is Ian responding to the fact that epochs are discussed in two places. I would rather fix that in a separate bug. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature