Re: Javascript team policy and rejection of node-three binary package [and 1 more messages]
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: Javascript team policy and rejection of node-three binary package [and 1 more messages]"):
> On വെള്ളി 09 മാർച്ച് 2018 04:48 വൈകു, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [Pirate:]
> >> I think the following change to point 5 of javascript policy [1] has
> >> consensus now.
> >
> > Woah, steady on there. You only just posted this proposal. It can't
> > possibly have consensus yet! Furthermore, I was mostly asking
> > questions and exploring possibilities.
>
> I was trying to summarize it based on my understanding of the responses
> so far, it is anyway not final without confirmation from others.
Right. Sorry, I had a bad reaction to "I think the following change
has consensus now". Normally the process is more like: discussion ->
outline suggestions -> proposals -> refinement -> consensus. By
definition a proposal only just posted cannot have consensus. I hope
this is clear.
I'm afraid I'm not in a position to answer your technical points now
because I'm travelling.
> I was traveling so could not reply earlier, the wait was not intentional.
Heh.
Regards,
Ian.
Reply to: