On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:11:02 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Tue 13 Nov 2018 at 05:51PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I suggest adding something like this to s1.1, "Scope", as a new 3rd > > paragraph: > > > > This manual cannot and does not prohibit every possible bug or > > undesirable behaviour. The fact that something is not forbidden by > > Debian policy does not mean that it is not a bug, let alone that it > > is desirable. Questions not covered by policy should be evaluated > > on their merits. > > Good idea. > > This seems strictly informative rather than normative, but I'd like to > see some reviews/seconds so that we can confirm that this is how the > wider project understands the role of the Policy Manual. > > (If no seconds but also no objections are forthcoming, I'll just apply > it as an informative change.) This sounds good to me. I concur that this is probably just informative but in case it's considered normative: 'seconded'. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Treibhaus: Gianni Coscia/Glianluigi Trove
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature