[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#910548: base-files - please consider adding /usr/share/common-licenses/Unicode-Data



Paul Hardy <unifoundry@gmail.com> writes:

> I understand your intention, but it's not that straightforward.  The
> data that I saw in Debian packages I looked through used various pieces
> of property data from various files from the Unicode Consortium within
> pre-built arrays also containing other data, though I didn't look
> through all packages that used Unicode data by any means.

> In my case, I used Unicode code point descriptions in the comment fields
> of lex patterns (flex on Debian) in my beta2uni program (part of my
> unibetacode package), which converts Beta Code to Unicode.  Here are a
> few such lines of code:

> \*\/[Aa] print_pattern (yytext, 0x0386);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER
> ALPHA WITH TONOS    */
> \*\/[Ee] print_pattern (yytext, 0x0388);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER
> EPSILON WITH TONOS  */
> \*\/[Hh] print_pattern (yytext, 0x0389);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER ETA
> WITH TONOS      */
> \*\/[Ii] print_pattern (yytext, 0x038A);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER IOTA
> WITH TONOS     */
> \*\/[Oo] print_pattern (yytext, 0x038C);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER
> OMICRON WITH TONOS  */
> \*\/[Uu] print_pattern (yytext, 0x038E);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER
> UPSILON WITH TONOS  */
> \*\/[Ww] print_pattern (yytext, 0x038F);  /* GREEK CAPITAL LETTER
> OMEGA WITH TONOS    */
> etc.

It's not directly relevant to this bug report, since the data in question
in some of these packages may be of a different nature, but it might be
worth pointing out that data such as what you show above is probably not
copyrightable under at least US law (and I think that exception is fairly
common internationally).  It therefore probably isn't meaningfully under
any license, although including the Unicode Data License in the package
doesn't hurt.

Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, let alone a copyright lawyer.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Reply to: