Hello, On Sat 18 Aug 2018 at 12:16AM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote: > It would be great if the specification were to include details of how it > will be updated so that producers and consumers understand what the contract > really looks like and the intended balance between backwards compatibility > and innovation. Good point. If it goes into the debian-policy package it is automatically subject to the Policy Change Process but we could add some additional information on what to expect with regard to this subpolicy in particular. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature