[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#883950: Next steps on "[GPL-3+]" proposal



Paul Hardy writes ("Bug#883950: Next steps on "[GPL-3+]" proposal"):
>      License: GPL-2
>       file:///usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2

I'm late to this party, but one of the things that is wrong[1] with
SPDX is that it implicitly encourages what I would call GPL-v2-only or
whatever, rather than (say) GPLv2+.

IMO in Debian we should not perpetuate this.

Ian.

[1] politically opposed to my own goals, probably deliberately so on
the part of the SPDX authors

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.


Reply to: