[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459427: Patch seeking seconds on changelog vs. NEWS handling



Hello gregor,

On Mon 23 Jul 2018 at 01:40PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:

> Let me see if I got this right, and apply it to the typical pkg-perl
> package:
>
> CPAN distributions usually contain no NEWS file, and do contain a
> Changes/ChangeLog/... file which is "an upstream release notes file"
> per the above definition (hand-written by the upstream maintainer,
> targetted at end users). (Numbers in message #65 in this bug report.)
>
> Currently we (i.e. typically dh_installchangelogs) install this
> Changes file as /usr/share/doc/package/changelog.gz. In the future
> we'd need to install it as /usr/share/doc/package/NEWS.gz; or still
> as changelog.gz if we can live with the deprecation (will this be
> allowed "forever"?).

Until we can remove the deprecation without making more than a handful
of packages buggy.  So, probably not for a long time.

> Did I get this right so far?

Yes.

> As written in message #140 in December, I still think we have two
> questions: which kind of files to install, and under which names.
> I think there's consensus for the first one, and this is expressed
> well in this patch. As for the second one, I have to admit that (if
> I'm reading the patch correctly) I'm still not happy of this forced
> rename of (CPAN) ChangeLogs to (GNU) NEWS.gz ...

Well, it is more like (CPAN) ChangeLogs to (Debian) NEWS.gz :)

I don't think it's right to view this as a forced rename, because of the
deprecation.  At least with this patch, there is no time limit.  We're
just stating that the newer practice is better.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: