[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#891216: seconded 891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump



Hello,

On Fri, Jun 29 2018, Wouter Verhelst wrote:

> Anyway, I've said my thing, I think people know about it now. I don't
> think we should make this a requirement in any form or shape (but
> would be happy with a strong recommendation if needs be); if I'm alone
> with that sentiment though, then that probably means the consensus
> disagrees with me and I'll have to live with it.

Just to be clear, as Policy delegate I am indeed making the judgement
that consensus is against you.

Thank you for contributing to the discussion!

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: