[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#891216: seconded 891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump



On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:58:28PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Bug#891216: seconded 891216: Requre d-devel consultation for epoch bump"):
> > Incorrect epochs are a nuisance at best.
> 
> The problem is that they are a permanent nuisance.  This discussion
> was prompted when someone caused significant trouble by *only* bumping
> the epoch.  (We have other text saying not to do that but I don't
> think that text would have prevented the error.)

They cause real issues, not just nuisances.  Check out the whole mariadb
situation, where a totally wrong epoch bump caused both maintainer to
not maintain anything anymore and now the debian packages are
incompatible with the rest of the world (not to mention the many
silently broken dependencies that who know when somebody will notice
them, but there must be some).


(I believe the trouble Ian is referring to is much minor, and it's the
case where an useless epoch bump in debian caused the ubuntu autosync
to fail due to reuse of filename - which has been "fixed" differently in
policy by forbidding epoch-free-version reuse)

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: