Re: Bug#299007: Transitioning perms of /usr/local
Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Bug#299007: Transitioning perms of /usr/local"):
> Thanks for doing this work! The original wording took me a few readings
> to parse; I suggest this instead:
>
> If /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local does not exist, /usr/local and all
> subdirectories created by packages should have permissions 0755 and be
> owned by "root:root". If /etc/staff-group-for-usr-local exists,
> /usr/local and subdirectories should have permissions 2775
> (group-writable and set-group-id) and be owned by "root:staff".
SGTM. (AKA "seconded".)
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
Reply to: