[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#683222: debian-policy: Policy section 4.4 is imprecise with respect to section 12.7



On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 05:22:12PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Commenting on Charles' patch, I think that it would be clearer to have
> the 'should' and 'must' requirements in separate sentences.

Good idea.

> diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
> index f706a13..89b355a 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
> @@ -99,10 +99,11 @@ later reconfigure the package without losing the changes you made.
>  Debian changelog: ``debian/changelog``
>  --------------------------------------
>  
> -Changes in the Debian version of the package should be briefly explained
> -in the Debian changelog file ``debian/changelog``.  [#]_ This includes
> -modifications made in the Debian package compared to the upstream one as
> -well as other changes and updates to the package.  [#]_
> +Every source package must include the Debian changelog file,
> +``debian/changelog``.  Changes in the Debian version of the package
> +should be briefly explained in this file.  [#]_ This includes
> +modifications made in the Debian package compared to the upstream one
> +as well as other changes and updates to the package.  [#]_
>  
>  The format of the ``debian/changelog`` allows the package building tools
>  to discover which version of the package is being built and find out

LGTM, seconded.


That said, I'd expect the upgrade-checklist to say that this change is
about clarifying that debian/copyright must exist (where before it was
"fine" not existing).

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: