[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#587377: marked as done (debian-policy: Decide on arbitrary file/path names limit)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:44:51 -0700
with message-id <87o9rlx51o.fsf@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive Policy bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #587377,
regarding debian-policy: Decide on arbitrary file/path names limit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
587377: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.7.2
Severity: important

dpkg won't let me install (upgrade to) the latest version of sbcl-doc:

Preparing to replace sbcl-doc 1:1.0.34.0-1.1 (using .../sbcl-doc_1%3a1.0.39.0-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement sbcl-doc ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/sbcl-doc_1%3a1.0.39.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 unable to clean up mess surrounding `./usr/share/doc/sbcl-doc/html/sbcl/Method-sb_002dbsd_002dsockets_003asocket_002dmake_002dstream-_0028_0028socket-socket_0029-_0026key-input-output-_0028element_002dtype-_0027character_0029-_0028buffering-full_0029-_0028external_002dformat-default_0029-tim' before installing another version: File name too long
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

I'll mark sbcl-doc as affected, but I'd argue that this is ultimately
a bug in dpkg for being unable to cope with such long filenames or
perhaps in dpkg-dev for allowing them into packages; one way or
another, there should not be skew, particularly in that direction.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils         8.5-1                  GNU core utilities
ii  libbz2-1.0        1.0.5-4                high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6             2.11.1-3               Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libselinux1       2.0.94-1               SELinux runtime shared libraries
ii  xz-utils          4.999.9beta+20100527-1 XZ-format compression utilities
ii  zlib1g            1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3       compression library - runtime

dpkg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages dpkg suggests:
ii  apt                           0.7.25.3   Advanced front-end for dpkg

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
control: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 +obsolete
control: tag -1 +wontfix

Russ Allbery and I did a round of in-person bug triage at DebConf17 and
we are closing this bug as inactive.

The reasons for closing fall into the following categories, from most
frequent to least frequent:

- issue is appropriate for Policy, there is a consensus on how to fix
  the problem, but preparing the patch is very time-consuming and no-one
  has volunteered to do it, and we do not judge the issue to be
  important enough to keep an open bug around;

- issue is appropriate for Policy but there does not yet exist a
  consensus on what should change, and no recent discussion.  A fresh
  discussion might allow us to reach consensus, and the messages in the
  old bug are unlikely to help very much; or

- issue is not appropriate for Policy.

If you feel this bug is still relevant and want to restart the
discussion, you can re-open the bug.  However, please consider instead
opening a new bug with a message that summarises and condenses the
previous discussion, updates the report for the current state of Debian,
and makes clear exactly what you think should change.

A lot of these old bugs have long side tangents and numerous messages,
and that old discussion is not necessarily helpful for figuring out what
Debian Policy should say today.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: