control: tag -1 +pending On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:40:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Well, if it's a common-enough error, I think there's no problem with also > mentioning this in the section on the clean rule. It's not likely that > this interpretation is going to change. Okay. > I'm on a war against footnotes in Policy because I think they make it much > harder to read (particularly in text form, particularly with DocBook which > now moves all the footnotes to the end of the chapter). I'd love to move > them all to either inline text or sidebars of some kind, although that's > going to be a long effort. > > s/should not/cannot/ (to get away from using standards language here and > because this isn't a Policy statement so much as a statement of > capability), and I would say "repacked to remove those files" in the last > sentence, but otherwise this looks good to me and could just be included > directly in that section on clean, I think. I don't have an informed opinion on footnotes, but thinking again, this change would be fine inline with the s/should not/cannot/ change. Since this is informative rather than normative, I've gone ahead and applied the change. Thank you for your review. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature