Hi, On 23/11/17 00:18, Sean Whitton wrote: >> So to be concrete, how about this: >> >> N. Packages with potentially offensive content >> >> As a maintainer you should make a judgement about whether the >> contents of a package is appropriate to include, whether it needs >> any kind of content warning, and whether some parts should be split >> out into a separate package (so that users who want to avoid certain >> parts can do so). In making these decisions you should take into >> account the project's views as expressed in our Diversity Statement. >> >> If you split out (potentially) offensive or disturbing material into >> a separate package, you should usually mark this in the package name >> by adding "-offensive". For example, "cowsay" vs >> "cowsay-offensive". In this situation the "-offensive" package can >> be Suggested by the core package(s), but should not be Recommended >> or Depended on, so that it is not installed by default. I second this patch. Thanks, Iain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature