control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello, On Wed, Nov 15 2017, James McCoy wrote: > One thing I'd like to note is that none of the vim-$lang virtual > packages are currently listed in Policy's set of virtual packages. > That was an oversight on the Vim maintainers side when the package > names were introduced, but maybe now would be a good time to correct > that. The point of listing virtual packages in Policy is to deal with disparate people maintaining packages that Provide the virtual package. If the people using the virtual packages are part of a tightly-knit packaging team, they can maintain the virtual packages themselves, without listing them in Policy. In light of this, could you confirm that this needs to go into Policy? I am not familiar with you Vim guys, what with being the co-maintainer of a dh_* tool for Emacs addons.. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature