[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688251: #688251: Built-Using description too aggressive



Hello Ansgar,

On Mon, Aug 28 2017, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> Sean Whitton writes:
>> +This field should not be used for purposes other than satisfying
>> +license requirements to provide full source code.
>
> The DFSG requires source code to be provided too...

Can you suggest a better word than 'full' to express the extra copyleft
requirements that the Built-Using field is getting at?

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: