Bug#844431: Revised patch: seeking seconds
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:01:00PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > This is about the reproducible builds team not using policy as a stick
> > for claiming a bar higher than what policy actually defines.
> >
> > Is it really allowed to claim that a package is not reproducible,
> > when it actually is reproducible according to policy?
>
> Yes, if your bug is of 'wishlist' severity.
You are not answering to any of the examples I gave in the email you
answered to.
"Does not build reproducibly during testing" statements in Tracker,
and red warnings in DDPO and Maintainer Dashboard.
Is it for you as policy editor perfectly fine or a bug in the
reproducible infrastructure when Tracker states (based on the
latest results from the reproducible builds infrastructure)
"Does not build reproducibly during testing" for packages
that are reproducible according to policy?
> Sean Whitton
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: