[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#555982: marked as done (debian-policy: RPATH in binaries and shared libraries)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:44:51 -0700
with message-id <87o9rlx51o.fsf@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive Policy bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #458824,
regarding debian-policy: RPATH in binaries and shared libraries
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
458824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458824
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.3.0
Severity: wishlist

Lintian has the following tag:

Tag: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
Severity: serious
Certainty: possible
Ref: http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
Info: The binary or shared library sets RPATH.  This overrides the normal
 library search path, possibly interfering with local policy and causing
 problems for multilib, among other issues.
 .
 The only time a binary or shared library in a Debian package should set
 RPATH is if it is linked to private shared libraries in the same package.
 In that case, place those private shared libraries in
 <tt>/usr/lib/<i>package</i></tt>.  Libraries used by binaries in other
 packages should be placed in <tt>/lib</tt> or <tt>/usr/lib</tt> as
 appropriate, with a proper SONAME, in which case RPATH is unnecessary.
 .
 To fix this problem, look for link lines like:
     gcc test.o -o test -Wl,--rpath,/usr/local/lib
 or
     gcc test.o -o test -R/usr/local/lib
 and remove the <tt>-Wl,--rpath</tt> or <tt>-R</tt> argument.  You can also
 use the chrpath utility to remove the RPATH.

and ftpmaster requires an override for this tag to allow packages into
the archive.  I believe Policy is currently silent on this topic.  The
normative contents of that wiki page should be turned into a Policy
proposal.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

debian-policy depends on no packages.

debian-policy recommends no packages.

Versions of packages debian-policy suggests:
ii  doc-base                      0.9.5      utilities to manage online documen

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
control: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 +obsolete
control: tag -1 +wontfix

Russ Allbery and I did a round of in-person bug triage at DebConf17 and
we are closing this bug as inactive.

The reasons for closing fall into the following categories, from most
frequent to least frequent:

- issue is appropriate for Policy, there is a consensus on how to fix
  the problem, but preparing the patch is very time-consuming and no-one
  has volunteered to do it, and we do not judge the issue to be
  important enough to keep an open bug around;

- issue is appropriate for Policy but there does not yet exist a
  consensus on what should change, and no recent discussion.  A fresh
  discussion might allow us to reach consensus, and the messages in the
  old bug are unlikely to help very much; or

- issue is not appropriate for Policy.

If you feel this bug is still relevant and want to restart the
discussion, you can re-open the bug.  However, please consider instead
opening a new bug with a message that summarises and condenses the
previous discussion, updates the report for the current state of Debian,
and makes clear exactly what you think should change.

A lot of these old bugs have long side tangents and numerous messages,
and that old discussion is not necessarily helpful for figuring out what
Debian Policy should say today.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: