On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:43:56PM +0000, Mike Gabriel wrote: > I am not saying that the build target must not be empty. I can be empty but > the build-a ... build-n dependecies have to be moved away from the binary > target and have to be made dependencies of the build target (which can only > have deps but no own instructions). > > And if that makes packages buggy, then they are actually quite buggy, > because the build-a ... build-n get executed in a fakeroot concept by design > of dpkg-buildpackage. And IMHO this should definitely be avoided. Just to be clear, I do agree with you that this situation where they are deps of the binary target is bad. Interested to hear what Santiago thinks. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature