Bug#758234: debian-policy: allow packages to depend on packages of lower priority
Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:
> First, minor point, but I think that #196367 (Clarify Policy on priority
> inversion in dependencies) can also be closed by the changes.
Thank you!
> Second, I would like to propose one more clarification to the
> description of the "Important" priority.
I believe this is #776557 (and kind of unrelated to this discussion).
Maybe move this discussion there? There's already been a fair bit of
(rather inconclusive) discussion on that bug.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: