[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please followup on Bug#568374



Hello Russ,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se> writes:
[...]
> > https://bugs.debian.org/568374
> 
> I'm going to try to dig through this.  Unfortunately, multiple patches on
> the same bug, some with revisions, some of which were seconded and some of
> which weren't, ended up being rather hard to dig through.  (Not your
> fault: it was a perfectly reasonable way to contribute to any other
> package.  This one is just rather weird, probably more weird than it needs
> to be.)  I need to find an hour or two of focused effort to understand the
> state of all of the patches, and just haven't been able to find it yet.

I think you're mixing #568374 up with something else possibly?

There's only one suggested wording change in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568374#14

Then there are three seconds on the above in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568374#24
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568374#29
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568374#34

(One of them being from a policy editor, and two release-team members.)

There are no alternative wording propolas and no seconds on anything
than the one proposal. It all looks pretty straight forward to me.
It just looks like it's been overlooked and is now hiding among all the
other open bug reports, so I wanted to highlight it again....

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson


Reply to: