Bug#769818: Re: Bug#769818: Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”
- To: 769818@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#769818: Re: Bug#769818: Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”
- From: Martin Erik Werner <ienorand@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:55:46 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1434722146.12789.7.camel@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Martin Erik Werner <ienorand@gmail.com>, 769818@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <55326636.2040504@debian.org>
- References: <CAE2SPAa9hMy47u83NxnsBs1sRif8bsfMmXu6Yu1D=b=sdKWcew@mail.gmail.com> <1428103547.14121.5.camel__13365.3005156249$1428103654$gmane$org@gmail.com> <551F6CD6.6040404@debian.org> <20150418062518.GJ8414@falafel.plessy.net> <55326636.2040504@debian.org>
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 10:12:06 -0400 =?UTF-8?Q?David_Pr=c3=a9vot?= <
taffit@debian.org> wrote:
> I assumed what lintian is actually pointing is the missing “Files:
*â€
> paragraph (instead of inaccurately using the header paragraph to
> document the main license), or any variant of it (e.g., documenting
> every files or directories in their own “Files†paragraph, as
debian/*
> already is).
This is not the case though, since even if a Files: * field is present,
this warning was triggered.
In newer versions of lintian, this warning has changed, so the
following file:
###
Format:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: td
Source: http://example.com
License: dog
This is dog license
Files: *
Copyright: someone
License: other
This is other license
###
Now reports
W: cn source: dep5-file-paragraph-reference-header-paragraph dog
(paragraph at line 7)
Which is as far as I see still the same false positive.
--
Martin Erik Werner <ienorand@gmail.com>
Reply to: